Everyone asks about AI
Management, clients or your team expect an assessment. You need a foundation for deciding whether and how to use AI.
Management, clients or your team expect an assessment. You need a foundation for deciding whether and how to use AI.
There are many ideas for AI. Which one offers the greatest value is still unclear.
You want to establish whether the data and technical foundations are sufficient, what quality is needed and whether users can trust the feature.
AI is not prompt theatre for us. We examine where it can concretely improve domain logic, user experience, or workflows.
We examine your ideas and find more, guided by user tasks rather than by hype. Every use case gets an honest assessment of impact and effort.
We check whether data, content, and structure are sufficient for an AI feature to work reliably, and what is missing if not.
We examine how AI fits into the user experience: expectations, control, failure states, and the moments where trust is built or lost.
We also look inward: where AI speeds up your design, content, and development workflows without diluting quality.


You get prioritised use cases, the missing prerequisites and a concrete next step. Any subsequent prototype is agreed separately.
Every relevant idea is assessed by value, effort, risk, and strategic fit.
You see which data, content, and processes exist, how transparency and control can be handled, and where the gaps are.
You get a concrete recommendation for the next step, including scope and a sensible sequence.
The strongest use case becomes tangible so users, subject experts, and management are not discussing an abstract idea.
Every relevant idea is assessed by value, effort, risk, and strategic fit.
You see which data, content, and processes exist, how transparency and control can be handled, and where the gaps are.
You get a concrete recommendation for the next step, including scope and a sensible sequence.
The strongest use case becomes tangible so users, subject experts, and management are not discussing an abstract idea.
No. The check starts from where you are. It shows what AI can do in your workflows and which foundations are still missing.
A reasoned prioritisation: which use cases hold up, what they need, and where you start. With a prototype instead of slides, if you wish.
Yes. Often the fastest lever is not in the interface, but in design, content, or development workflows. The check covers both.
Yes, when the initiative and conditions fit. We shape and design the AI use case, build the frontend, and build the backend with our Node stack. For requirements outside that stack, we work with your engineering or specialised partners. The check remains useful on its own and commits you to nothing.
Explore AI Experience DesignThe Ready Check and optional prototype are offered separately with a defined scope and fixed price. You know the deliverables and total price before you start.
We consider data flows, transparency, user control, failure cases and operational risks as part of the usage concept. Binding legal or data-protection assessments are not our service. We involve your internal or external specialists for those.
No. The check first shows which data a use case needs, what quality is available and which limits apply. Missing or unsuitable data is an important outcome of the check, not a barrier to getting started.

Marco or someone from the team will get back to you, within 24 hours on working days.