Design systems must work in Figma, code and AI.

As soon as inconsistency costs speed: when several people work on the UI, components get built twice, or every handover needs a discussion first. What matters is how much coordination and duplicated work this creates.

Figma, code or both, depending on your needs. We review existing tokens and components and extend them. We coordinate implementation and integration with our own development team, your in-house engineering team or an external partner.

Early. We build the system in usable stages: tokens and the most-used components first, so the effect reaches daily work right away.

Both. We assess and consolidate existing systems, build new foundations, and scale design systems for additional applications, brands, and functions. We determine the right path from your current inventory and next goals.

Yes. For an assessment and system build, we define the scope in advance and offer a guaranteed total price. For an ongoing partnership, we agree on a fixed monthly retainer. We agree on extensions together before they create additional costs.

Yes, if the design system is built for it. Semantic design tokens, clearly named components, and documented variants, states, and rules create a reliable foundation for copilots and AI agents. We also define where automated suggestions need review so system quality remains under control.

Yes. Contrast, focus states, keyboard interaction, component variants and understandable interactions are considered at system level. Where we implement frontend components, semantics and interaction behaviour are also part of the definition.

With established ownership, contribution rules, documentation and a suitable review rhythm. You can run the system yourselves afterwards. If ongoing support makes sense, minddraft can stay involved selectively or on a fixed retainer.